- 11 Οκτ 2017, 15:58
#442538
Εχμ... όχι ακριβώς...
Disappointing outcome of Bardens vs. Lanka: measles proven to exist, but anti-vaxxer Lanka keeps his moneyIt seems that after three years of struggle in court, the Ravensburger Measles process has finally reached its endpoint. Extremist anti-vaxxer Stefan Lanka, who denies the existence of harmful viruses, had set out a reward of 100,000 euros for scientific prove that there is such a thing as a virus that causes measles. The young doctor David Bardens provided Lanka with six articles that show this, but Lanka denied that this evidence met the criteria of his challenge.
Bardens took Lanka to court to have him pay and at first this seemed to be succesful. The court appointed an expert to judge the evidence and this person, professor Andreas Podbielski, was quite clear that the the articles Bardens had sent in should be considered sufficient to meet the material criteria of Lanka’s bet and so the court ordered him to pay. Lanka appealed this decision and won on formal grounds. The higher court ruled that Lanka was free to judge whether any evidence sent in for his bet, was good enough in his opinion.
Now Bardens tried to get this ruling revised, but unfortunately (in December 2016) the court saw no reason for that . Case closed it seems. According to DAZ Online (Bundesgerichtshof hält sich aus Masernstreit heraus ) Lanka is now telling his followers that this outcome means that there is no prove of the existence of measles and that it is now established that there is no legal ground for the vaccination programmes worldwide. Podbielsky has harshly criticized this interpretation of the court rulings and stated that Lanka has only won because of semantic and legal subtleties. None of the six articles alone are enough to prove that measles exist, but together they prove this beyond any reasonable doubt.
Σε απλά Ελληνικά, το δικαστήριο σε πρώτο βαθμό διέταξε τον αρχιπαπάρα να πληρώσει, δεχόμενο πως ο διδάκτορας παρουσίασε πειστικά δεδομένα. Ωστόσο, σε ανώτερο βαθμό και στον ανώτατο, το δικαστήριο έκρινε πως μόνο ο αρχιπαπάρας μπορεί να κρίνει αν οι αποδείξεις πληρούν τα ΔΙΚΑ ΤΟΥ κριτήρια. Δηλαδή ΠΡΟΦΑΝΩΣ και το δικαστήριο δεν ασχολήθηκε με το αν υπάρχει ο ιός. Απλά είπε πως ο Λάνκα (ο αρχιπαπάρας) θα κρίνει ο ίδιος αν κάτι πληρεί τα κριτήρια που ο ίδιος έχει θέσει και το δικαστήριο είναι αναρμόδιο.
Φυσικά, ο αρχιπαπάρας δεν ασχολείται με τέτοιες "λεπτομέρειες", απλά λέει στους μαλάκες πως το δικαστήριο τον δικαίωσε... Το ότι πεθαίνουν παιδάκια από ασθένειες που αντιμετωπίζονται εύκολα με ένα εμβόλιο προφανώς δεν τον απασχολεί, μόνο η |λογοκρισία| του.
Παλούκι στον κώλο όλων αυτών!
Έχουν το αίμα τόσων παιδιών στα χέρια τους!
Then:
Peugeot 206 1.6 110ps
Citroen C4 Picasso 1,8
MWB 320i Ε90
Now:
Audi A3 1,6 FSI =>
